Re: The requirements cycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex,

> Eric,
> 
>   Looking at this from the high-level perspective...
> 
>   Though I became the responsible AD for PPVPN just recently, I was
>   exposed to certain aspects of interaction between ADs are PPVPN WG
>   chairs. There was clearly a communication problem there. I believe
>   it's been solved and we are in a much better shape now. Trying to
>   investigate who said what and whose fault that was in the past will
>   not be pretty, so I suggest we don't go there. 

I suggest we *do* go there (irrespective of whether it will, or
will not be pretty), as doing this could help us to understand the
mistakes that have been made. And unless we do understand these
mistakes, we are (very) likely to repeat them.

Yakov.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]