Re: The requirements cycle (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual....)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Sure; but the reqs,  framework, protocol specs, and applicability
> statements were all  ready 18 months ago.  They  could have been
> submitted  as a group. But we were told, "first you need  to submit
> the first document, then a year or so  later you can  submit the 
> second".  This is  a very peculiar  way to encourage progress  ;-)

L2VPN is not progress.  It's the opposite.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]