Re: spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I simply mean that when the returns are low enough, spammers will stop.  If
spam produces so much noise that people stop using e-mail, that will stop
the spammers.

However, I think that for the vast majority of Internet users, spam is only
a minor nuisance, and they will probably continue to use e-mail with or
without spam.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Thomas" <mat@cisco.com>
To: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
Cc: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 22:56
Subject: Re: spam


> Anthony Atkielski writes:
>  > Noel writes:
>  >
>  > > It *better* be solvable, otherwise when email
>  > > becomes 99% spam, everyone will stop reading email.
>  >
>  > I wouldn't worry about that.  When everyone stops reading e-mail, spam
will
>  > disappear again.  Remember, spammers only send out spam because people
reply
>  > to it.  If nobody replies, they'll stop.
>
> You mean I might yet achieve salvation without my
> procmail rosary beads? Will it be preceded by the
> RFC 822 apocalypse?
>
> Mike
>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]