On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:15:52PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Tom Marshall wrote:
> >I have found that IPv6 seems to have a much longer round trip delay than
> >IPv4 for just about every site that I have tried. For example, pinging
> >www.rfc-editor.org from here gives me this:
> >
> > IPv6: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 589.174/678.001/1109.953/117.776 ms
> > IPv4: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.346/48.524/130.290/37.593 ms
> >
> >Also, note that I cannot get an HTTP response from www.rfc-editor.org using
> >IPv6. The connection is established fine, but the server does not respond
> >to requests.
>
> I can't comment on the routing issues (IPv6 connectivity esp. to the
> 6bone seems to have been flaky), but the RFC editor IPv6 server has been
> up since last week.
>
> You should see "you are using IPv6 from
> 2001:490:f002:128:240:96ff:fe40:5bc9" on the bottom of the front page if
> all went well.
>
> Browser issue?
No, I verified with this:
$ telnet www.rfc-editor.org 80
Trying 3ffe:801:1000:0:2d0:b7ff:c0de:3...
Connected to www.rfc-editor.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.0
[... wait a couple minutes ...]
^]
telnet> q
Connection closed.
My IPv6 address is 2001:460:410:8128::/64.
--
An American is a man with two arms and four wheels.
-- A Chinese child
Attachment:
pgp00201.pgp
Description: PGP signature