I sometimes put the working group name on drafts also. But an RFC is never issued by a working group. It is issued by the I* after IESG review and usually after IETF Last Call. I'm dubious about putting the WG name in the RFC but if that were done, it shouldn't be more than an interior footnote. Thanks, Donald ====================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Street +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w) Milford, MA 01757 USA Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Scott W Brim wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:17:05 -0500 > From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> > To: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Network Working Group > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 12:16:45PM -0800, Fred Baker allegedly wrote: > > I personally would like to see us stop attributing documents to them. > > The world has long since moved on, and those who don't recognize it > > date themselves. > > I stopped using it on drafts a few years ago. I use the relevant WG.