Re: A charter for the IESG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



why don't you have an irc meeting so we can all publically give our
comments on this.

regards
joe baptista

Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god

  Free Tibet http://free.tibet/

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> Hello,
>
> in December, I published an internet-draft called
> "draft-iesg-charter-00.txt", containing a proposed text for an IESG charter.
> A revised version (-01) was published in January based on comments.
>
> A version with some further clarifications is created, but not published
> before the cutoff - it's available at
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/chair/iesg-charter.txt
>
> Some discussion has taken place on the POISED list
> (poised@lists.tislabs.com), but the point has been made that for such a
> potentially important document, the IETF list may actually be a more
> appropriate venue for discussion. Hence this note.
>
> This IESG charter attempts to capture what the IESG has believed that it
> has been asked to do by the IETF community. Most of the document is simply
> collecting references to sections of other IETF BCP documents, and
> attempting to form a coherent picture of what the IESG is supposed to be
> doing. I do not believe that it shows the IESG to be much different from
> what the community currently believes it is.
>
> What I hope to do with this document is:
>
> - Discuss it on this mailing list and on the POISED mailing list as the
> community finds appropriate
>
> - Discuss it privately in San Francisco with those who are concerned, and
> in the plenary if there are questions raised from the community
>
> - Send out a revised version some time after San Francisco
>
> - Issue a four-week Last Call for BCP on the document once discussion has
> stabilized
>
> - Approve it for BCP before the Vienna IETF
>
> At the Vienna IETF, the "problem" working group is scheduled to make a
> consensus call on the process for *changing* the IETF process. While the
> shape of the result is still unknowable, I believe it's likely that among
> the outputs of such a process will be a greatly changed IESG charter.
>
> But until then, I believe there is value in publishing this document.
>
> What does the community think?
>
>                  Harald Alvestrand
>
>
>
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]