> Changing the title as Keith suggests would confuse the issue of whether > what is in the document meets the community consensus test. no, it would clarify which parts of IESG operation were derived from consensus documents (by docmenting which ones) and which parts were decided by IESG, and what the justification for those were. it is premature to entertain significant changes to IESG operation (other than, say, for increased transparency) before we entertain changes elsewhere in the organization. Keith