Re: Bind 9 AXFR Modification vs AXFR Clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21 Feb 2003, D. J. Bernstein wrote:

> Mark.Andrews@isc.org writes:
> > Whenever you have a parent and child zones under different administrative
> > controls it is impossible to change both zones simultaniously.
>
> False.
>
> Set the clocks correctly, and schedule the change on all the servers for
> a particular time, using (for example) the tinydns timestamp feature
> described in http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html. When that time
> rolls around, all the servers will change their data simultaneously, as
> RFC 1034 requires.

Clever.

> Yes, this is difficult to achieve with BIND, AXFR, etc. But it's easy to
> achieve with better software, better replication protocols, etc. You're
> making a fool of yourself when you call it ``impossible.''

This could be done with a slight change to AXFR. Lets include it in the
MAXFR proposal (the axfr mods, taken out of the "clarification".






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]