D. J. Bernstein wrote:
But Rob Elz made a clear point in seemingly the only message you *didn't* respond to that your implementation could cause interoperability problems by potentially allowing for different contents of the same zone with the same serial number. I won't regurgitate the rest of his message, but it's in the archives.The IETF shouldn't be sticking its nose into private implementation decisions that don't cause interoperability problems.
If he's right (and it seems to me that he is), that's an indication for either a standards clarification or a bug fix to your code, and maybe both (indicated, IMHO).
Eliot