--On torsdag, februar 20, 2003 00:07:52 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:
The charter for the IETF list (RFC 3005, also visible at http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html) includes the sentenceWhat we have here is much worse: a thoroughly dishonest attempt to slip the latter modification past us as part of an ``AXFR clarification.'' Anyone with a shred of integrity should be opposing this fraud.
Accusations of "dishonesty" and "fraud" in a technical discussion are normally considered "unprofessional".Inappropriate postings include: - Unsolicited bulk e-mail - Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or technical concerns - Unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject - Announcements of conferences, events, or activities that are not sponsored or endorsed by the Internet Society or IETF. The IETF Chair, the IETF Executive Director, or a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents a pattern of abuse.
I would also want to direct your attention to RFC 3184, "IETF Guidelines for Conduct", which states, among other things:
Note to list: The normal procedure when dealing with unprofessional conduct on mailing lists includes a private warning. But since mr. Bernstein has chosen not to accept mail from me without asking me to engage in some arcane ritual of admission, I have chosen to skip this step in this case.2. IETF participants develop and test ideas impartially, without finding fault with the colleague proposing the idea. We dispute ideas by using reasoned argument, rather than through intimidation or ad hominem attack. Or, said in a somewhat more IETF-like way: "Reduce the heat and increase the light"
Harald Alvestrand