Bert, my bad - what I meant was that the extensions in the normative references would be ietf approved by indirection, when the documents asking for code points were approved was not obvious to people reviewing (at least it was not obvious to me, not that anyone tried to run a secret process and I'm concerned that the OIF has specified extension to LDP, and preliminary allocated message names from the IETF concnsus space more than a year ago and that this does not show in the IANA registry yet. there are (I believe) implementations of the UNI spec deployed. /Loa Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
loa> The consequence of approving the drafts will be that the extensions
loa> by OIF and ITU will be approved by the IETF. I'm not sure that this
loa> has been in the open.
Two points: - the extensions to LDP were found to be in space that requires IETF Consensus, and so Scott and I asked for an IETF Last Call on the document. That is an explicit OPEN process
Bert
-- Loa Andersson Mobile +46 739 81 21 64 Email loa@pi.se