*> *> Hi, *> *> I just saw the message that this document has been approved. I *> have a question about the process. *> *> Definition in RFC 2434, "IETF Consensus - New values are assigned through *> the IETF consensus process". The CR-LDP code points are clearly marked *> as "IETF Consensus", not IESG Approval. *> *> I have heard repeatedly, from at least 5 different ADs that three people *> for and one against does *not* constitute a consensus -- in fact, this *> was repeated in the TE WG list a couple of days ago. *> *> There were several people that raised various objections, from nits *> to technical issues. Many remain unanswered. *> *> Am I to understand that the IESG inferred consensus from the discussions *> that have taken place (and are still under way)? *> *> Kireeti. *> Since I was CC'd, I will note that in my role as IANA designated expert for RSVP, I interpret "IETF consensus" as meaning that at least a Last Call was conducted. To use any other interpretation seems to me to be dishonest. I guess I am agreeing with Kireeti. Bob Braden