On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Bob Braden wrote: > According to the IANA assignment rules for RSVP values, the only two > options are IETF consensus and FCFS. The document in question is the *CR-LDP* Extensions. I am (sadly) aware of the RSVP assignment status. > *> If code points are to be allocated from the space to be allocated by > *> IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a *Standards Track* document be > *> written, with more detail on the messages, especially their processing. > > Indeed, that is what "IETF consensus" means, isn't it? Is it? That's good. Currently, the document is Informational, and is being processed as such. Can this be changed? Kireeti.