Adrian, Adrian Farrel wrote:
ok - I can see the difference - and it seems that you are correct. Iftrying to understand what you are saying - it seems like you are implying that there is no consensus with in ITU on how to progress this, and that therefore would be premature for IETF to publish this as an informational RFC. Correct?I'm not quite saying that. I am saying that it sounds to me from the discussion that the ITU has not yet reached consent. It seemed to me that if the draft is intended to document the ITU preferences as informational, it would be as well to wait until the ITU has fully signed off. I don't see any rush for this.
the ITU discussion still has some way to go before the discussion
settles and the preferences better known - wouldn't it be appropriate to wait until this happens?
Osama, care to comment?
/Loa
Anyhow - I think it would be appropriate to add a note clarifying that IETF will not progress cr-ldp beyond Proposed Standard.Adrian
-- Loa Andersson Mobile +46 739 81 21 64 Email loa@pi.se