RE: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What Randy says!

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: woensdag 11 december 2002 2:08
> To: Yakov Rekhter
> Cc: Paul Hoffman / VPNC; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area 
> 
> 
> >  1. Are we discussing whether to shut down asap the WGs that are 
> >     presently in the sub-IP area ?
> 
> maybe some folk are.  in fact, the ietf is now big enough that
> surely someone is.  but i don't think it is one of the alternatives
> which harald, bert, scott, the iesg, ... put forward
> 
> >  2. Are we discussing whether to move these WGs from one area to 
> >     another, while making sure that such move would have no impact 
> >     on the work that is going on in these WGs ?
> 
> that was one of the alternatives.  though possibly some folk thought
> it might have a positive impact on the work going on in the wgs.
> 
> >  3. Are we discussing whether it would be possible to shut down the 
> >     WGs that are presently in the sub-IP area  without stating this 
> >     explicitly by dissolving the sub-IP area and moving these WGs 
> >     to some other areas ?
> 
> indeed, you may be discussing that.  seems you are.  but i don't think
> harald, bert, scott, the iesg ... were doing so.
> 
> randy


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]