RE: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For whatever it is worth, I support Option 3 ("Status quo").
 
I think that the "hard" decision (currently postponed) will be become simpler
as we shall see conclusion of some of the WGs curently in the Sub-IP area and
probably creation of some new ones.
 
Also why to change something that is working just fine?
 
With best regards,
                                   Sasha Vainshtein
email:     sasha@axerra.com
tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
           +972-8-9254948 (res.)
           +972-58-674833 (cell.)
 
 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]