increasingly often I find WGs whose definition of "the best possibleI have two problems with this statement. First, while I am all for being critical of our processes for the purposes of improving them, we as a group should avoid making these sorts of generalizations. Say what you will about Dan Bernstein. At least his complaints are specific and backed up.
outcome" is inconsistent with, and in some cases almost diametrically
opposed to, the interests of the larger community.
Second, I believe the complaints that are alluded to have been raised again and again and again. Can we as a community learn to agree to disagree on points of architecture, once decisions have been made?
Eliot