Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <200211290559.gAT5xSUf009585@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>, Valdis.Kletni
eks@vt.edu writes:
>
>
>
>On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:45:23 PST, Einar Stefferud <Steflist@thor.nma.com>  sai
>d:
>
>> ICANN stands alone in its EXCLUSIVNESS, while arguing 
>> that there must only be one root.  All others must die!
>
>Think .BIZ.
>
>Now go back and *CAREFULLY* re-read RFC 2826.  Note that nowhere
>does it say that ICANN has to be "the root".  What it says is "either you
>have one centrally coordinated root, or you have Balkanization".
>

This is precisely the point.  It doesn't matter who selects the TLDs; 
all that matters is that there be a consistent set.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]