RE: namedroppers mismanagement, continued

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok... I have to know...

Randy,

Can you please put bill@strahm.net on the approved posters list for
namedroppers ?

Isn't it as simple as that ?

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG [mailto:owner-ietf@IETF.ORG] On Behalf Of
Keith Moore
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Erik Nordmark
Cc: ietf@IETF.ORG
Subject: Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued 


> If folks need to post all the time from a different
> address than their subscription address *they* should take the step to

> get that posting address added to the approved posters list.

that might be fine, except

- in the current situation, even postings from occasional posters 
  are being blocked.  and when postings are blocked, the message is 
  terse and cryptic (even insulting) and contains no clue about how 
  to workaround the problem

- getting on the "approved posters" list is not well documented or
  understood.  for some list software this is a manual operation 
  requiring the list admin to edit a file; on others it is under
  control of the subscriber but he/she has to "subscribe" the alternate
  address using some obscure option like /NOMAIL.
 
I've run several IETF lists myself and I know how much of a pain it is
to filter out spam.  Yes, the process is error prone.  Yes it's 
a pain to keep approving posts from the same person (though it's 
easy to fix that problem, and no I don't think adding that person to an
approved posters lists is assuming too much).  And yet I still don't
think that namedroppers is being managed appropriately.

Can we please fix this problem which has gone on for several years and
stop pretending that this behavior is acceptable?

Keith




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]