Re: kernelizing the network resolver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: kernelizing the network resolver
From: V Guruprasad <vgprasad@IEEE.ORG>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:50:56 -0500
Cc: John Stracke <jstracke@centivinc.com>, ietf@IETF.ORG, vg96@columbia.edu
In-reply-to: <200211051958.gA5JwxU14516@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Reply-to: vgprasad@IEEE.ORG
Sender: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i



On Tue 2002.11.05, Keith Moore wrote:

> No it doesn't, because your overloading of DNS names for this purpose
> interferes with their utility for other purposes.
>
> Keith

Imho, use of A records is not an overload.

References:
- Re: kernelizing the network resolver
  - From: V Guruprasad
- Re: kernelizing the network resolver
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: kernelizing the network resolver
Next by Date: Re: kernelizing the network resolver
Previous by thread: Re: kernelizing the network resolver
Next by thread: Re: kernelizing the network resolver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]