Re: Re[2]: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Ward Harold wrote:

> As John says XML-RPC actually predates SOAP. It's also simpler and thus
> easier to implement but SOAP has better support for handling complex types.
> Ultimately you have to choose the one that best meets your application
> requirements. I do feel strongly that HTTP is the wrong transport protocol
> for an RPC mechanism; BEEP is a much better choice.

HTTP and BEEP aren't transport protocols.

session and transfer protocols, perhaps.

Since they both run over TCP, they're both completely wrong for RPC.

L.

XMLRPC - it's not XML, and it's not RPC.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]