RE: TCP/IP Terms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Eric Tomson wrote:
> I think that such terms as "Internet", "Intranet" and
> "Extranet" DO owe their existence to the wide
> implementation and use of TCP/IP.
> So - IMHO - you don't have to worry about TCP/IP to
> "survive" and "compete" (particularly against SPX/IPX
> and NetBIOS/NetBEUI). ;)
> TCP/IP DOES RUN on any Intranet, Extranet and Internet,
> because - by definition - they DO RUN TCP/IP.
> Regarding OSI, just consider it as a theoretical
> reference model particularly well-fitted for training
> purposes (even if it's NOT limited to that), if this
> can ease your mind. :)
> P.S.: on the other hand, I don't think TCP/IP needs to be
> "protected". It only needs a smooth migration to IPv6.

I Agree with Eric (BTW Eric I stole your PDU names for the OSI model,
they're better than mine). This has nothing to do with the protocol
suite, but with model semantics.

Michel.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]