Re: Multihoming Issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <caitlinb@RP.ASOMI.NET>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues


> On 9/4/02, Jim Fleming wrote:
> 
> >From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
> >> Could we switch this thread to where it belongs (the
> >> multi6 WG)?
> >=============================
> >
> >Would it not be more appropriate on an IPv6-based network ?
> >Why would IPv4 users (here) care about A6 ?
> >
> 
> Does that mean that you believe "IPv8" should only be
> discussed on "IPv8" networks?
> 

What do you mean by IPv8 ?
Are you familiar with how IPv16 works ?

Have you asked the C@t ?
http://www.ddj.com/articles/1993/9310/
http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0208/25.jaguar.php


Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]