----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Baker" <fred@cisco.com> To: "Gordon Cook" <cook@cookreport.com> Cc: <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:28 PM Subject: Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence" > At 02:33 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, Gordon Cook wrote: > >ICANN's YOUR organization Vint. > > is there any chance that you could take this discussion of an organization > that the IETF doesn't report to, answers questions for (as it does for > anyone else) when asked, and tries very hard to otherwise say nothing in > particular about, to some list that has something to do with said other > organization? > > sheesh... > http://www.isoc.org/ a.. New! ICANN staff preliminary recommendation: ISOC to manage .ORG. This preliminary report follows an extensive bidding and evaluation process. .... a.. Cisco Fellow Fred Baker to Chair ISOC's Board of Trustees ==================================================================== Who owns IN-ADDR.ORG ? What plans are there for 128-bit DNS services for .ORG owners ? Does the ISOC have a license for 128-bit DNS technology ? Will .ORG be used to test the new 128-bit DNS alias mapping features with .ORGY ? How many servers are planned in each of the 32-bit DNS .ORG Mirrored Registries ? ...when will those servers be available and how do you plan to test soft-failover arrangements ? ...will there be a .ORG test laboratory with TWO complete collections of servers to model what is out in the field....BEFORE....going live ? Jim Fleming 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think... http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt 0:190 ORG [ORGY]