Re: Multihoming Issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb@rp.asomi.net>
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 21:53:24 -0400
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, ietf@IETF.ORG
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Tue, 03 Sep 2002 20:07:38 CDT.") <r01050300-1015-B4A10826BFA211D6B973003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]>
Sender: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG

> However, in such a mode, the hostmaster
> would not have declared these two 'totally seperate'
> intrfaces to have the same name.

why not?  it's done all the time in v4, in order to distribute load
across several servers.

References:
- RE: Multihoming Issues
  - From: Caitlin Bestler

Prev by Date: Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
Next by Date: Re: Multihoming Issues
Previous by thread: RE: Multihoming Issues
Next by thread: Re: Multihoming Issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]