----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu> To: "Vernon Schryver" <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Cc: <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:59 AM Subject: Re: Why spam is a problem. > > But is spam doubling every year? I can't say that it is. I also can't > > say it isn't. Yes, I saw reports of Brightmail's press release as well > > as other media reports. It is wise to discount such statements just as > > much as reports about any single mailbox, including your own. Our > > individual spam loads are merely anecdotes, and outfits such as Cloudmark > > and Brightmail need spam to increase so they can stay in business. > > I don't doubt that people's experience of spam varies widely, and > the figures you cited were quite interesting. It's clear that > we should not accept any individual's reports as being representative. > And yet, even if only a small percentage of users are being "hammered" > this prevents email from being an effective and ubiquitous communications > medium - even among those individuals and businesses that have Internet > access. > > Keith I haven't had a lot of trouble. But I don't give out my e-mail address to all these servers that ask for your e-mail address either. That might be working in my favor. In regards to the svenska radio story, if spammers had to pay for bulk advertising when bots are used that might cut spam. >