Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 8:32 AM +0300 15/8/02, Pekka Savola wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Keith Moore wrote:
>>  > There must be a secure method that would allow a receiver to 
>>verify whether
>>  > or not the sender actually exists as a user on the mail server for the
>>  > domain the e-mail is coming from.
>>
>>  this is already possible.  it is not sufficient.
>
>It's possible but it's useless as one can't depend on it: too many MTA's
>are configured to refuse EXPN/VRFY requests if they were implemented in
>the first place.

It'd still be next to useless if everyone did implement it and allow 
its use - it's not sufficient because checking if the email address 
is correct won't help you if the header is forged.

(A quick check on spam I've received today indicates around 70% has a 
forged envelope address - and of those around 15% have *my* address 
as the source.)

Also, in many cases there are security issues (real and imagined) 
with having an external mail relay machine (as part of a firewall 
system) know what addresses are and are not valid.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]