On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > Martin, Ned, > > Yesterday I participated in a W3C/IETF coordination > call where one of the topics was about the registration > of mime types defined by W3C Recommendations. A summary > of the meeting will be available soon to the W3C Membership. what about the IETF membership? L. > As a result of that meeting, I'm expecting the following: > > a) Joseph Reagle will write down detailed best current practice > for W3C Editors to conform with IETF process (notably > RFC2048). I hope to make Joseph's document part of the > Chair's guidebook. > > b) There may be some medium- to long-term changes to the > IETF process to facilitate registration of mime types > defined by W3C Recommendations. Some of those who attended > yesterday's meeting will be finding out what changes might > be possible. > > I'm writing to get a clearer idea of whether this will be > discussed at the Yokohama meeting in Japan (14-19 July), > and if so, in what forum. > > Who will be attending that meeting from W3C? Martin, I > am told you will be attending. Is this a discussion you could > monitor? > > Also, can we expect a report after the meeting that sets > expectations for W3C editors about future registration > options and when those might be available? Should we assume > at this point that for the next, say, 6 months, W3C editors > should follow the steps that Joseph will outline? > > Thank you, > > - Ian > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/meetings/IETF-54.html > [2] http://www.ietf.org/meetings/agenda_54.html > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260-9447 > > <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>