Re: IPR at IETF 54

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>         one that's O(logN) with a non-RF license
>and
>         one that's O(NlogN) with an RF license
>
>i probably wouldn't need to think very hard to go with the
>latter. simply because we'll see a lot more community good...

Right.  Standards exist so that we can get interoperability; expensive 
licenses limit interoperability.

/==============================================================\
|John Stracke                    |Principal Engineer           |
|jstracke@incentivesystems.com   |Incentive Systems, Inc.      |
|http://www.incentivesystems.com |My opinions are my own.      |
|==============================================================|
|"The Empire has a tyrannical and repressive government." "What|
|form of government is that?" "A tautology."                   |
\==============================================================/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]