Re: IPR Re: IETF 54 calendar (fwd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If what you are asking for is that for every proposal / i-d that shows
> up in the IETF, the IPR holder is automatically required to provide an
> RF license, you really don't understand the reason people bother with
> patents to begin with.

doesn't follow.  it's entirely possible to understand why people bother 
with patents and still believe that IETF shouldn't support their use to
prevent free implementation of a standard.

Keith


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]