At 02:58 PM 5/28/02 -0500, Pete Resnick wrote: >Again, I'm not going to object to using meeting time for this kind of session if that's what's needed. But other than Harald's message, I have not heard anything about this since Minneapolis and have not heard folks clamoring for such a meeting. Heck, we haven't seen a proposed agenda for a meeting let alone an I-D. How was it decided that everyone would obviously want to go and that therefore a separate session was needed? I'd like to see a session on IPR that doesn't conflict with other meetings. It would be endlessly great if it could be declared mandatory :-). IPR is increasingly a huge nuisance, and because the current policy is less than completely clear there's a lot of confusion about it when it comes up. Although this may not be a problem (until the lawyers show up) there's not a lot of consistency among working groups. Melinda