Re: Moving Towards UTF8 vs ASCII(ACE) Forever

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com> schrieb/wrote:
> There is now a standard way to encode URIs containing arbitrary UNICODE
> characters. This is described in RFC 3275 (which is currently a Draft
> Standard), in Section 4.3.3.1, ...

This document does not tell you how to encode hostnames, i.e.  
whether the ACE version or the Unicode version is considered the  
"true" hostname for URIs.

If you want DNS i18n to work with leagacy URI-handling software,  
you must use the ACE version to build your URIs.

Claus
-- 
------------------------ http://www.faerber.muc.de/ ------------------------
OpenPGP: DSS 1024/639680F0 E7A8 AADB 6C8A 2450 67EA AF68 48A5 0E63 6396 80F0


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]