RE: TCP Checksum Interoperability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Michael Smith wrote:

> The last time this came up for a TCP implementation I used to
> maintain, our interpretation of Robustness Principle applied to this
> problem dictated that we shouldn't send segments with checksum fields
> set to all ones (that is, we shouldn't send ~(+0)), but that we had to
> accept either ~(+0) or ~(-0) in received segments.
>
> Strictly speaking, either zero state is completely legal

Not so. Please read RFC1624 sections 3-5.

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]