Re: Moving Towards UTF8 vs ASCII(ACE) Forever

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> schrieb/wrote:
> second, "ASCII for the rest of our lives" is a mischaracterization.
> IDNA allows applications to accept and present IDNs in native
> form, without requiring all applications and infrastructure to
> upgrade before IDNs can be used. [...]
> users don't care whether IDN queries are encoded on the wire.

This depends on your definition of "on the wire"; if you want to
IDNs to just work, you would have to put the ASCII version into
URIs, too. Users *do* care about URIs. If you put the UTF-8
version (%-escaped or maybe even unencoded according to a revision
of the URI specs) in the URI, they won't work with leagacy
software anyway (so ACE has no advantages).

Claus
-- 
------------------------ http://www.faerber.muc.de/ ------------------------
OpenPGP: DSS 1024/639680F0 E7A8 AADB 6C8A 2450 67EA AF68 48A5 0E63 6396 80F0


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]