John Stracke wrote: > And the authors do caution that their numbers are blind to the quality of > the RFCs. Their point, though, is that looking at the easy metrics is > better than not measuring anything at all; Wrong information is worse than no information. If the results don't mean anything, why measure? Lars -- Lars Eggert <larse@isi.edu> Information Sciences Institute http://www.isi.edu/larse/ University of Southern California
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature