*> *> * though I wish that WGs that shut down without producing a protocol *> document would at least write up a brief RFC that explains what it *> tried to do and why it shut down - was the problem "too hard" or *> infeasible, was the subject too politically contentious (and what *> were the divisive positions), were there found to be adequate *> solutions already developed, did people lose interest, or what? *> but sometimes even this much reporting is too difficult. *> *> Strongly agree. What we don't want to do is to measure productivity by page count or even RFC count. Hey, I could have written the RSVP RFC as five documents; would that be a win? I don't think so. Bob Braden