"J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > I think you're seriously confused here. ISP's don't make a substantial share > of their money selling addresses (and therefore desiring a scarce market in > same), and I gather that for most of them, the costs of administering extra > addresses is just about covered (if at all) by the extra charging. Perhaps these ISPs do not desire a scarce market, but they do not wish to run out of addresses (forcing them to buy more or turn away future customers). --gregbo