RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>The protocols explicit probe the first hop router on the network for
>upnp capabilities.  In their model of a home gateway/LAN there is no
>"internal" routing, the world is bridged, so the signaling should not
>damage routing transparency.

But just imposing that model removes transparency.  Maybe I have a router
between my wireless and wired Ethernets.  That's a reasonable thing to
do--say, if the wired segment is 100Mbps and is carrying high-bandwidth
{broad|multi}cast traffic.  Or maybe I have a substantial number of home
appliances with network connections, and I don't trust their software to
be secure, so I put them in a DMZ, like this:

(Internal LAN) <--> (Firewall A) <--> (DMZ LAN) <--> (Firewall B) <-->
(Outside world)

/===============================================================\
|John Stracke                    |Principal Engineer            |
|jstracke@incentivesystems.com   |Incentive Systems, Inc.       |
|http://www.incentivesystems.com |My opinions are my own.       |
|===============================================================|
|If God had not given us duct tape, it would have been necessary|
|to invent it.                                                  |
\===============================================================/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]