Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Keith Moore wrote:
	[..]
> 1. it's unreasonable to expect occasional commentators to subscribe to a list
>    before sending traffic there.

#include "we_all_dug_our_heels_in_over_this_topic_12_months_ago.h"

>  (it's completely reasonable to expect them to
>    read the charter, and any drafts they are commenting on, but not to jump
>    through extra hoops and to flood their mailboxes with unwanted traffic)

I think we've already established that send-only addresses are possible.
This removes the issues of being flooded by incoming mails from a list to
which you're cross-posting.

> 2. it's unreasonable to expect those who post from one address and subscribe
>    to the list using a different address, to have to know a secret handshake
>    that puts their posting address on the whitelist.

Why on earth would the handshake be secret?

> A simple fix for #2 is to put the instructions for getting on the whitelist
> on the WG's charter page, and on any other announcements for the list.

Precisely.

cheers,
gja
-- 
Grenville Armitage
http://gja.space4me.com


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]