Re: [idn] WG last call summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:23:11 GMT, Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk>  said:

> That's not actually completely true. Badly written software will break. In 
> particular throwing up chars to the shell might break things, but that's 
> particularly specific to a platform. Pipes won't break. Copy and Paste may 
> depending on OS, and 'from where and to where'. Generally, it won't. If it 
> does, it's because somebody has written some *really* crusty code that can't 
> handle ASCII outside 0-127. The IETF shouldn't be in the business of making 
> sure everythign works with badly written code.

Hmm.. so you're saying that *ALL* that code out there that double-checked that
things that claimed (possibly implicitly) to be USASCII were in fact in the
0-127 range are "crusty" code?

Damn.  Sendmail 8.12.3.Beta1 is crusty - it actually bothers checking.

What's wrong with this picture?
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

Attachment: pgp00039.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]