Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't want to approve senders. I want to approve posts. Some senders
> send approved posts as well as non-approved posts. Some formats are not
> approved (BCC, CC'd in long lists, etc.)
> 
> I don't want to filter on sender; I want to filter on spam content, so I
> filter on spam content. Using non-spam info (sender) to infer spam
> content is needlessly indirect.

it's a tradeoff.  one solution delays all messages and introduces a greater
risk that the moderator will exercise too much control over content.  the 
other solution delays first posts more than others and risks some spam 
getting through.  

I prefer the latter compromise. however, I don't think this should be
carved in stone for all WG lists for all time.  I do think there need to be 
clearly established limits on how zealous a moderator can be in filtering
messages, visibility for the moderator's actions, etc.

Keith


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]