Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-11.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah, great, I see that you have picked up some (but not all) of my comments.

New nits:

-- What is DCCP-STP?
-- I don't think that RFC 5124 defines the media-field.
   (Did you want to reference 5234 here?)

--
           o  This specification also permits the use of DTLS with the UDP	
 	      transport that encapsulates DCCP packets.  When DTLS is used at	
 	      the encapsulation layer this protects the DCCP headers.  This	
 	      prevents the headers from being inspected or updated by network	
 	      middleboxes (such as firewalls and NAPT).  It also eliminates the	
 	      need for a spearate DTLS handshake for each DCCP connection.

Where does it permit that?
(If this sentence is intended to be normatively define entirely new functionality, it MUST NOT be in the security considerations.)
How exactly does the definition of the 4-/6-tuples change when you do that?
E.g., what happens if the DTLS epoch changes?

-- spearate

Grüße, Carsten




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux