Hello, May I ask a question? For me as a user of DCCP, - I am not an expert in this area - it is unclear how to set up a bidirectional RTP connection with DCCP-UDP or DCCP-STD. Do two DCCP connections have to be opened - one for each direction -, or did I missed some RFCs or drafts describing how to negotiate it with SDP? With best regard, Christian --------------------------------------------------------------- Dr.-Ing. Christian Hoene Interactive Communication Systems (ICS), University of Tübingen Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, Phone +49 7071 2970532 http://www.net.uni-tuebingen.de/ -----Original Message----- From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phelan, Tom Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:15 PM To: dccp@xxxxxxxx Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-01 Hi All, I've created a new version of dccp-udpencap (see below). The major changes are using the standard DCCP header and not allowing the use of partial checksums. Feedback appreciated. Tom P. -----Original Message----- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:13 PM To: Phelan, Tom Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-01 A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Thomas Phelan and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap Revision: 01 Title: Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Encapsulation in UDP for NAT Traversal (DCCP-UDP) Creation_date: 2010-06-24 WG ID: dccp Number_of_pages: 11 Abstract: This document specifies an alternative encapsulation of the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), referred to as DCCP-UDP. This encapsulation will allow DCCP to be carried through the current generation of Network Address Translation (NAT) middleboxes without modification of those middleboxes. The IETF Secretariat.
