Hi Michael, Thanks for the input. Hopefully you'll get some good feedback and we can go forward with this. Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Michael Welzl > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 4:19 AM > To: Pasi Sarolahti > Cc: DCCP working group; Dragana Damjanovic > Subject: Re: DCCP and IETF-77 > > Hi, > > I believe that we're going to see a few reviews of MulTFRC: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-welzl-multfrc-01.txt > in the ICCRG group's mailing list very soon. > (within the next few days, hopefully). > > If these, and possibly the outcome of the ensuing discussion, > are favorable enough in your opinion, I'd like to make another > request for our MulTFRC draft to become a WG item. > > For this, I'd come to Anaheim and request that on site > if that makes sense to you. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Pasi Sarolahti wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We should soon decide whether DCCP needs to meet in the next IETF. > > By the next meeting we are expecting to have just one active WG > > draft, on UDP encapsulation, about which I sent a query earlier. > > Therefore, we would like to probe if there are any other topics we > > should discuss in Anaheim. If there not many topics to discuss, it > > probably isn't necessary to schedule a DCCP session. In this case we > > could try to ask agenda time from some related working group to > > discuss UDP encapsulation. It was mentioned earlier that TSVWG would > > be quite close to this work. > > > > If you have a topic you'd like to discuss in DCCP meeting, please > > let the chairs know within the next couple of weeks. > > > > Thanks! > > > > - Pasi & Tom > >
