Hi, On 2009-11-21, at 0:34, Michael Tüxen wrote: > On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Phelan, Tom wrote: >> Thanks for the info on SCTP. That makes it sound like SCTP and DCCP encaps could be high-level-approach compatible. Is there a draft you're working from for SCTP encap? The last one I saw was substantially different from what you describe. > > the last was is outdated. It was written before I implemented the stuff in > the SCTP implementation of FreeBSD and Mac OS X. > I'm planning to update it for the next IETF. I think it'd be desirable if the proposed UDP encapsulations for DCCP and SCTP were as similar as possible. Lars
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
