Yes, I do plan on updating the natencap draft -- any day now... Tom P. ________________________________ From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of Pasi Sarolahti Sent: Mon 11/16/2009 4:47 PM To: Andrew Lentvorski Cc: DCCP working group Subject: Re: DCCP minutes On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> re udp encapsulation >> - Magnus Westerlund: issue will be discussed in tsvarea on Friday. >> Magnus is split on the idea, he sees the benefit, but also the >> concern >> - Colin Perkins: we have an implementation of the nat encapsulation >> - Murari Sridharan: lots of people are trying to implement, but the >> lack of firewall traversal is stopping people. some udp encap would >> be good. >> - Markku Kojo: don't need a spec, just fill out the iana form >> - Magnus: yes, but a spec is importent. > > What was the final result about UDP encapsulation and NAT traversal? You forgot to quote one line from this part: > - Colin: why don't we just publish Tom Phelan's draft as > experimental? Ask Tom to resubmit it (or I'll do it...) I believe Tom plans to update the UDP encapsulation draft, and when done, we will then see where to go from there. - Pasi
