The WG call for interest is still on-going, and will conclude at the end of this week. Please write your thoughts.
I see there has been some notes of support for progressing CCID-4 in the working group, but no discussion as far as I can see on CCID-3 drops. Specifically, this has been put forward as a STD-Track RFC, to modify CCID-3 AND also as a requirement for CCID-4. Is this a good idea? Do you plan to implement this? Could we live with JUST using this in CCID-4? Thoughts?
Gorry -------- Original Message -------- The following 2 Internet Drafts were presented at the last IETF, and we agreed that after this meeting to ask the IETF dccp WG whether they would agree to adopting these as official work items: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dccp/draft-kohler-dccp-ccid3-drops-01.txt EXP http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dccp/ draft-floyd-dccp-ccid4-01.txt PS Documents accepted by the WG are intended to be finally published as Standards-track RFC, according to the Charter milestone in: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dccp-charter.html At this time, we are asking working group members and interested parties to send comments/queries/objections to either the dccp WG mailing list (above) or to me as a WG Chair (gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx). Comments on this topic received before 21st September 2007 would be helpful in making this decision. In particular we are seeking feedback on any of: * Have you read the current drafts? * Is this work useful to you or your organisation? * Do you have ideas/text/comments that you would like to contribute? * Is this work ready for progression by this WG? Please *do* reply if you would like to see this work proceed. Best wishes, Gorry Fairhurst & Tom Phelan (DCCP WG Co-Chair)
