Re: WG Last Call for RTP over DCCP draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eddie,

On 11 Jun 2007, at 20:49, Eddie Kohler wrote:
Better late than never, perhaps; some comments on RTP over DCCP.

The draft is clear and really well written which is awesome.

Thanks!

In Section 5.2, you might point out that a given Service Code may be specified in many ways. RTP processors should not look for the string "SC:RTPA", but rather for the corresponding service code value; i.e., "SC=1381257281", "SC=x52545041", and "SC:RTPA" are all valid ways to request that service code. The current text is not explicit about this, perhaps risking misinterpretation. The example in 5.5 addresses this but maybe too late. Either something could be added after "Section 8.1.2 of [2]." (e.g.: "Note that a given service code value may be specified in any of the hex, decimal, and ascii formats; processors MUST base their behavior on service code values independent of format."), or the first bullet defining SC:RTPA could be extended to say "(Equivalent service code definitions include SC=1381257281 and SC=x52545041.)"

Okay, this is worthwhile. I'll make the change.

Cheers,
Colin


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux