On 5/16/07, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Following up on this, since no NAT that I know of currently translates DCCP, IMO there isn't a need to be as super-conservative with the timeout as ICE needs to be for UDP. Something longer is probably fine. Lars
Linux has translated DCCP for NAT for quite a few releases now. Don't know what the timeout is though. It is treated basically the same as TCP and UDP. Ian -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group
