On 4/20/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ian, I would appreciate if in future you would not copy patch descriptions over from dccp@vger to dccp@ietf. Apart from the fact that I don't like it, this creates the wrong idea among people who have little or nothing to do with actual protocol implementation - it produces an impression of "let's talk about some implementation bugs". (But competent implementation feedback is welcome and solicited on dccp@vger) Which is the more regrettable since you are right in raising this point as a general one: it is indeed a limitation of [RFC 3448, 4.6] with regard to non-realtime OSes. To clarify, the two main issues of this limitation are summarised below.
Yes I was a bit lazy in replying without changing the subject etc. My apologies. I'm refraining on replying further on these topics until I do some experimentation which may be a while off. Ian -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group
